Chitosan biopolymer-F(ab′) immunoconjugate films for enhanced antigen recognition
Journal of Materials Chemistry B, ISSN: 2050-750X, Vol: 1, Issue: 4, Page: 500-511
2013
- 12Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef10
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
The limited stability and random orientation of antibodies passively adsorbed onto solid supports are some of the main factors limiting the analytical performance of immune-based assay systems. Although the use of specific antibody-binding proteins led to significant enhancements in sensitivity, several uncertainties related to the orientation of these layers and the stability of the complexes formed with the antibodies need to be addressed for further progress. This paper introduces an alternative strategy based on the use of a charged polysaccharide layer for the stabilized and oriented assembly of antibody fragments. About one monolayer of F(ab′) fragments of anti-human immunoglobulin G was passively adsorbed onto mercaptopropionic acid (MPA) and MPA/chitosan modified Au surfaces showing very good conformational stability. However, interrogation tests in the presence of human immunoglobulin G showed a piezoelectrical antibody binding signal about two times higher when the fragments were adsorbed onto chitosan. Given the similar coverage and conformational stability found in both cases and considering the different electrostatic scenarios, it is strongly suggested that the enhanced recognition of antigens may arise from the assembly of F(ab′) mostly oriented in a hinge down end-on phase. Supporting this view, a limit of detection of about 3 μg mL was obtained from electrochemical methods. Although high, this is one of the best results reported (to the best of our knowledge) in proof-of-concept experiments using 2D electrically insulating immobilization layers with such a limited antibody loading capacity. © 2013 The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84876582399&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2tb00115b; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32260821; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C2TB00115B; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C2TB00115B; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2013/TB/C2TB00115B; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c2tb00115b; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2013/tb/c2tb00115b
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know