Solid-state electrochromic devices: Relationship of contrast as a function of device preparation parameters
Journal of Materials Chemistry C, ISSN: 2050-7526, Vol: 2, Issue: 14, Page: 2510-2516
2014
- 49Citations
- 50Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The establishment of a relationship between device performance parameters such as switch speed and photopic contrast with device composition, electrochromic polymer thickness, and gel electrolyte composition is reported here for a versatile one-step preparation method of relatively large area, 105 cm, solid-state electrochromic devices. The electrochromic polymer, hereby, generated from a monomer after device construction, i.e. in situ, is a way to simplify the fabrication of electrochromic devices by reducing waste generation and assembly time as well as by increasing the versatility of device manufacturing in an open atmosphere. Photopic contrast is a critical property for electrochromic displays, windows, and lenses necessitating the study of how changing the selected material and device properties such as monomer diffusion, thickness of the electrochromic polymer layer, and ionic conductivity of the electrolyte impact electrochromic device functionality. More specifically photopic contrast performance is evaluated as a function of polymerization time, effective electrochromic polymer layer thickness, monomer loading, salt loading, thickness of the gel electrolyte, and in situ conversion temperature. Photopic contrasts of 47% for polybiphenylmethyloxymethyl-3,4- propylenedioxythiophene (BPMOM-ProDOT), 46% for poly2,2-dimethyl-3,4- propylenedioxythiophene (PProDOT-Me), and 40% for poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) without background correction were achieved. © 2014 the Partner Organisations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84896341736&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3tc32319f; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C3TC32319F; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C3TC32319F; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2014/TC/C3TC32319F; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3tc32319f; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/tc/c3tc32319f
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know