Quantitative-nanoliter immunoassay in capillary immune microreactor adopted inkjet technology
Analytical Methods, ISSN: 1759-9679, Vol: 6, Issue: 9, Page: 2832-2836
2014
- 10Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
A quantitatively controlled immunoassay at the nanoliter level based on inkjet technology was developed. The volumes of solutions/samples introduced were accurately controlled at the nanoliter level by using a four-channel inkjet microchip. Antibody/antigen recognition was performed in an amino modified capillary with a short diffusion distance. As a proof-of-concept, a sandwich immunoassay of human IgA was conducted using the developed method. The results demonstrated a low detection limit (0.03 ng mL) and a wide linear range (0.1-100 ng mL, R = 0.9959), comparable to currently used methods. For each capillary immunoassay, the volumes of the ejected solutions for human IgA, FITC conjugated anti-human IgA and the glycine-HCl dissociation solution were 52.15 ± 1.53 nL, 65.70 ± 2.06 nL and 37.51 ± 0.96 nL, respectively. This method, in which an inkjet functions as a novel "nanoliter pipette" in combination with a capillary for nanoliter immunoassays, has promising applications in areas of clinical diagnosis and drug screening. © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84898661931&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4ay00216d; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C4AY00216D; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2014/AY/C4AY00216D; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C4AY00216D; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c4ay00216d; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2014/ay/c4ay00216d
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know