Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of silica nanoparticle-induced toxicity in zebrafish embryos
Toxicology Research, ISSN: 2045-4538, Vol: 5, Issue: 2, Page: 609-620
2016
- 24Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations24
- Citation Indexes24
- 24
- CrossRef11
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
Although silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) have a promising application in biomedical fields, there is still a lack of comprehensive understanding of genome-wide transcriptional analysis. This study aims to clarify the toxic effect and molecular mechanisms of SiNPs in zebrafish embryos based on microarray analysis and bioinformatics analysis. Microarray data analysis demonstrated that SiNP-induced toxicity in zebrafish embryos affected expression of 2515 genes, including 1107 genes that were up-regulated and 1408 genes that were down-regulated. These differentially expressed genes were subjected to bioinformatics analysis for exploring the biological processes triggered by SiNPs in zebrafish embryos. Gene ontology analysis showed that SiNPs caused significant changes in gene expression patterns related to many important functions, including response to stimuli, immune response, cellular processes, and embryonic development. In addition, pathway analysis and Signal-net analysis indicated that the gap junction, vascular smooth muscle contraction, and metabolic pathways, apoptosis, the MAPK signaling pathway, the calcium signaling pathway and the JAK-STAT signaling pathway were the most prominent significant pathways in SiNP-induced toxicity in zebrafish embryos. In addition, the results from qRT-PCR and western blot analysis showed that the IL-6 dependent JAK1/STAT3 signaling pathway was activated by SiNPs in zebrafish embryos. In summary, our data will provide compelling clues for further exploration of SiNP-induced toxicity in zebrafish embryos.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84959286246&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5tx00383k; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30090375; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C5TX00383K; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2016/TX/C5TX00383K; https://academic.oup.com/toxres/article/5/2/609-620/5568655; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c5tx00383k; https://academic.oup.com/toxres/article-abstract/5/2/609/5568655?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know