A comparison of the experimental and theoretical charge density distributions in two polymorphic modifications of piroxicam
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, ISSN: 1463-9076, Vol: 18, Issue: 41, Page: 28802-28818
2016
- 16Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations16
- Citation Indexes16
- 16
- CrossRef14
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
Experimental charge density distribution studies of two polymorphic forms of piroxicam, β-piroxicam (1) and piroxicam monohydrate (2), were carried out via high-resolution single crystal X-ray diffraction experiments and multipole refinement. The asymmetric unit of (2) consists of two discrete piroxicam molecules, (2a) and (2b), and two water molecules. Geometry differs between (1) and (2) due to the zwitterionic nature of (2) which results in the rotation of the pyridine ring around the C(10)-N(2) bond by approximately 180°. Consequently, the pyridine and amide are no longer co-planar and (2) forms two exclusive, strong hydrogen bonds, H(3)⋯O(4) and H(2)⋯O(3), with bond energies of 66.14 kJ mol and 112.82 kJ mol for (2a), and 58.35 kJ mol and 159.51 kJ mol for (2b), respectively. Proton transfer between O(3) and N(3) in (2) results in significant differences in surface electrostatic potentials. This is clarified by the calculation of atomic charges in the zwitterion that shows the formally positive charge of the pyridyl nitrogen which is redistributed over the whole of the pyridine ring instead of concentrating at N-H. Similarly, the negative charge of the oxygen is distributed across the benzothiazine carboxamide moiety. The multipole derived lattice energy for (1) is -304 kJ mol and that for (2) is -571 kJ mol, which is in agreement with the experimentally determined observations of higher solubility and dissolution rates of (1) compared to (2).
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992212824&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6cp02690g; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27722530; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C6CP02690G; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2016/CP/C6CP02690G; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C6CP02690G; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6cp02690g; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/cp/c6cp02690g
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know