A giant negative magnetoresistance effect in an iron tetrabenzoporphyrin complex
Dalton Transactions, ISSN: 1477-9234, Vol: 45, Issue: 42, Page: 16604-16609
2016
- 7Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef7
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
By measuring the electrical resistivity in TPP[Fe(tbp)(CN)] (TPP = tetraphenylphosphonium and tbp = tetrabenzoporphyrin) under the application of a static magnetic field, a giant negative magnetoresistance (MR) effect with high anisotropy is observed. More specifically, the MR ratio at 13 K under a field of 9 T perpendicular to the c axis is -70%, whereas the MR ratio under a field parallel to the c axis is -40%. Furthermore, electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements indicate large anisotropy in the principal g-values of d spin (S = 1/2) in the [Fe(tbp)(CN)] unit; the g value almost perpendicular to the tbp plane and the g and g values almost parallel to the tbp plane are 3.60, 1.24, and 0.39, respectively. It is revealed that the anisotropy in the MR effect arises from the anisotropy in the d spin, suggesting that the d spins in TPP[Fe(tbp)(CN)] affect the π-conduction electron via the intramolecular π-d interaction. The anisotropy and magnitude in the giant negative MR effect for TPP[Fe(tbp)(CN)] are smaller than the corresponding values for the isostructural phthalocyanine (Pc) analogue TPP[Fe(Pc)(CN)]. This is consistent with the fact that the intermolecular antiferromagnetic d-d interaction in TPP[Fe(tbp)(CN)] (suggested by the Weiss temperature: Θ = -8.0 K) is weaker than that in TPP[Fe(Pc)(CN)] (Θ = -12.3 K). This indicates that the minor modification in coordination complexes can significantly affect the MR effect via tuning the intermolecular d-d interaction as well as the intermolecular π-π overlap.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992731119&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6dt01911k; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27477610; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C6DT01911K; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2016/DT/C6DT01911K; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C6DT01911K; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c6dt01911k; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2016/dt/c6dt01911k
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know