Chromium-substituted hematite powder as a catalytic material for photochemical and electrochemical water oxidation
Catalysis Science and Technology, ISSN: 2044-4761, Vol: 7, Issue: 14, Page: 2940-2946
2017
- 21Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Fe(iii) and Cr(iii) mixed oxide (FeCrO) particles were examined as water oxidation catalysts under photochemical and electrochemical conditions. Photochemical water oxidation activity was evaluated under visible light irradiation (480 < λ < 500 nm) in the presence of tris(2,2′-bipyridyl)ruthenium(ii) sulfate and sodium persulfate, which served as a redox photosensitizer and a sacrificial electron acceptor, respectively. Electrochemical water oxidation was conducted in a phosphate buffered aqueous solution (pH 7.5) using FeCrO particles, which were loaded on a transparent conductive glass support, in the presence of an electrochemical bias. While hematite (α-FeO) is known to be a catalytic material for water oxidation, its catalytic activity dropped upon substitution of Cr(iii) ions for Fe(iii) sites in FeO at least in part due to oxidative dissolution of Cr(iii) on the oxide surface, which competed with water oxidation during the reaction. On the other hand, Cr-substitution resulted in a five-fold enhancement in the activity for electrochemical water oxidation to form oxygen. Electrochemical impedance measurements revealed that the Cr-substitution decreased the resistance of charge transfer inside the FeO bulk, thereby leading to improved performance for electrochemical water oxidation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026913379&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7cy00580f; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C7CY00580F; http://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C7CY00580F; http://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2017/CY/C7CY00580F; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7cy00580f; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2017/cy/c7cy00580f
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know