Understanding dissolution process of chitin crystal in ionic liquids: Theoretical study
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, ISSN: 1463-9076, Vol: 20, Issue: 31, Page: 20669-20677
2018
- 47Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations47
- Citation Indexes47
- 47
- CrossRef33
- Captures44
- Readers44
- 44
Article Description
Chitin is a promising biomass resource and has high potential for industrial applications owing to its huge annual production in nature. However, it exhibits poor processability and solubility due to its very stable and crystalline character. Recently, ionic liquids (ILs) have attracted attention as solvents for structural polysaccharides-for example, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium bromide (AMIMBr) has been found to dissolve chitin. As few ILs are known to dissolve chitin, little research has been conducted on the dissolution mechanism involved. In this study, we have adopted a molecular dynamics (MD) approach to study the dissolution of chitin crystals in imidazolium-based ILs. The MD simulation in AMIMBr has demonstrated that the dissolution process involved peeling of chitin chains from the crystal surface, with Br cleaving the chitin hydrogen bonds, and AMIM preventing a return to the crystalline phase after the peeling. By contrast, in imidazolium acetates, which has also been reported to dissolve chitin, although the molecular chains are peeled off, the peeled chains occasionally return to the crystalline phase. Furthermore, the MD trajectory analysis has revealed that the solubility of chitin is well correlated with the number of intermolecular hydrogen bonds by acetamido groups in the chitin crystal. It has been experimentally proven that mixing a small amount of 2-bromoethyl acetate, as a bromide generator, with 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride can enhance chitin solubility, which supports the dissolution mechanism indicated by the above theoretical results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85051560650&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8cp02749h; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30059116; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C8CP02749H; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8cp02749h; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2018/cp/c8cp02749h
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know