Photocatalytic ammonia production enhanced by a plasmonic near-field and hot electrons originating from aluminium nanostructures
Faraday Discussions, ISSN: 1364-5498, Vol: 214, Issue: 0, Page: 399-415
2019
- 17Citations
- 44Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef12
- Captures44
- Readers44
- 44
Conference Paper Description
Ammonia production at room temperature and atmospheric pressure is in high demand to assist in energy saving and the protection of the environment worldwide, as well as to help reduce CO emissions. Recently, plasmonic nanomaterials have been frequently used for solar to chemical energy conversion, which has the potential to replace existing energy-intensive industrial processes. In our approach, plasmonic aluminium nanotriangles (AlNTs) were used to investigate the impact of plasmonic effects on photocatalytic ammonia production. Plasmonic near-field coupling to a semiconductor and hot electron generation from AlNTs were studied in detail through the use of electrochemical photocurrent measurements. A narrowband LED beam with a central wavelength at 365 nm was used to illuminate the AlNTs and their hot electron generation efficiency was estimated to be 2 × 10%, resulting in an ammonia production rate of 4 × 10 μM h mW cm, which corresponds to a quantum efficiency of 2.5 × 10%. In the case of plasmonic near-field coupling, AlNTs-embedded TiO demonstrates a charge-carrier generation efficiency of 2.7%, which is ∼2.3 times higher than that of bare TiO. The ammonia production rate of AlNTs-TiO is 0.1 μM h mW cm with a quantum efficiency of ∼0.06%, which corresponds to ∼2.4 times that of the rate demonstrated by bare TiO (0.04 μM h mW cm, quantum efficiency ∼ 0.025%). The obtained results confirm successful ammonia production through nitrogen splitting at room temperature and under atmospheric pressure. Moreover, according to the presented results, the use of plasmonic aluminium structures remarkably improves the ammonia production rate.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066501270&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8fd00146d; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30815653; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=C8FD00146D; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c8fd00146d; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2019/fd/c8fd00146d
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know