A method to predict both the relaxation time of quantum tunneling of magnetization and the effective barrier of magnetic reversal for a Kramers single-ion magnet
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, ISSN: 1463-9076, Vol: 22, Issue: 18, Page: 9923-9933
2020
- 80Citations
- 32Captures
- 19Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations80
- Citation Indexes80
- 80
- CrossRef64
- Captures32
- Readers32
- 32
- Mentions19
- Blog Mentions19
- Blog19
Article Description
In this work, a theoretical method for the prediction of both the relaxation time of quantum tunneling of magnetization (τQTM) and the effective barrier of magnetic reversal (Ueff) is proposed for single-ion magnet (SIM) systems of Kramers type. The reliability of theoretical τQTM is tested within a large series of 18 lanthanide SIMs. Compared to the experimental results, the deviations of theoretical τQTM are within one order of magnitude for 11 tested SIMs and the largest order-of-magnitude deviation is only 1.86. In the aspect of Ueff, for 5 typical high-performance Dy-SIMs of the local coordination mode of a pentagonal bipyramid, the relative deviations of theoretical values lie within the range of 1.4-7.2%. Thus this method possesses good reliability, at least in the aspect of the order of magnitude. Besides an empirical estimate of the local magnetic field experienced by the central ion, for a given SIM, one ab initio calculation, providing accurate g-factors of both ground and excited Kramers doublets (KDs), is the only computational cost. Therefore this method has a high degree of both reliability and efficiency. Based on the temperature dependence of theoretically predicted Ueff and its contributions from various KDs, some mechanistic information on the magnetic relaxation could be given by this method too. Therefore it is reasonable to expect the bright prospect of this method in the aspects of both the interpretation of the existing experimental results and rational design of future high-performance SIMs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084694181&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0cp00933d; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32309845; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D0CP00933D; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0cp00933d; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2020/cp/d0cp00933d
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know