Ammonia fluxes and emission factors under an intensively managed wetland rice ecosystem
Environmental Science: Processes and Impacts, ISSN: 2050-7895, Vol: 23, Issue: 1, Page: 132-143
2021
- 22Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations22
- Citation Indexes22
- 22
- CrossRef16
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Nitrogen (N) loss from rice production systems in the form of ammonia (NH3) can be a significant N loss pathway causing significant economic and environmental costs. Yet, data on NH3 fluxes in wetland rice ecosystems are still very scarce which limits the accuracy of national and global NH3 budgets. We measured the NH3 fluxes in situ in a wetland rice field and estimated emission factors (EF) under two soil management systems (i.e. conventional tillage, CT and strip tillage, ST); two residue retention levels (i.e. 15%, LR and 40% crop residue by height, HR); and three N fertilization rates (i.e. 108, 144 and 180 kg N ha-1) in two consecutive years (2019 and 2020). The highest NH3 peaks were observed within the first 3 days after urea application. The mean and cumulative NH3 fluxes significantly increased with the increases in N fertilization rates and were 18.5% and 18.6% higher in ST than in CT in 2020 but not in 2019. Overall, the highest mean NH3 fluxes were in 180 kg N ha-1 coupled with either HR or LR and ST or CT. In 2019, the NH3 EF was unchanged by any treatments. In 2020, the lower EF was in CT coupled with LR (15%) than all other treatment combinations, where ST with HR showed the highest EF (20%). Likewise, the lowest N rate (108 kg N ha-1) in ST had the highest NH3 EF (20%) that was similar to higher N rates (144 and 180 kg N ha-1) in the same tillage treatment and to 180 kg N ha-1 in CT. Our results highlight that NH3 fluxes in rice field particularly the effects of ST correlated with higher soil pH and NH4+ content and lower redox potential. Our results highlight that NH3 fluxes are a potentially large N loss pathway in wetland rice under conventional and decreased soil disturbance regimes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85100992045&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0em00374c; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33367373; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D0EM00374C; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d0em00374c; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/em/d0em00374c
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know