An antibacterial ϵ-poly-l-lysine-derived bioink for 3D bioprinting applications
Journal of Materials Chemistry B, ISSN: 2050-7518, Vol: 10, Issue: 40, Page: 8274-8281
2022
- 12Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- CrossRef9
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
The limited availability of bioinks has hindered the application of 3D bioprinting to tissue engineering, and bacterial infection is a serious threat to these applications. Aiming to solve this problem, a novel ϵ-poly-l-lysine (EPL)-derived antibacterial bioink has been developed for 3D bioprinting and tissue-engineering applications. Three glycidyl methacrylate (GMA)-modified EPL products, EPLGMA-1, EPLGMA-2, and EPLGMA-3, were prepared by reacting 3, 4, and 5 mL GMA with 5 g EPL, respectively. EPLGMA-1, EPLGMA-2, and EPLGMA-3 were photocurable and their corresponding photo-crosslinked hydrogels, EPLGMA-1H, EPLGMA-2H, and EPLGMA-3H, all exhibited very high antibacterial rates, good biocompatibility, good degradability, and promising mechanical properties. After EPLGMA-1H, EPLGMA-2H, and EPLGMA-3H with encapsulated chondrocytes were incubated for 4 weeks, EPLGMA-3H was the best one among them for tissue-engineering applications due to its most efficient tissue regeneration. Carrying chondrocytes, the EPLGMA-3 solution was printed into hydrogel products with high-fidelity shapes and high cell viability using a projection-based 3D bioprinter. Following the implantation of chondrocyte-loaded EPLGMA-3H samples into nude mice for 4 weeks, cartilage-like tissue was regenerated, suggesting that EPLGMA-3 is a promising antibacterial bioink for 3D bioprinting and tissue-engineering applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139978897&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1tb02800f; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36134908; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D1TB02800F; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d1tb02800f; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/tb/d1tb02800f
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know