Multi-mass velocity map imaging study of the 805 nm strong field ionization of CFI
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, ISSN: 1463-9076, Vol: 24, Issue: 31, Page: 18830-18840
2022
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Multi-mass velocity map imaging studies of charged fragments formed by near infrared strong field ionization together with covariance map image analysis offer a new window through which to explore the dissociation dynamics of several different highly charged parent cations, simultaneously - as demonstrated here for the case of CFI cations with charges Z ranging from 1 to at least 5. Previous reports that dissociative ionization of CFI cations yields CF, I and CFI fragment ions are confirmed, and some of the CF fragments are deduced to undergo secondary loss of one or more neutral F atoms. Covariance map imaging confirms the dominance of CF + I products in the photodissociation of CFI cations and, again, that some of the primary CF photofragments can shed one or more F atoms. Rival charge symmetric dissociation pathways to CFI + F and to IF + CF products and charge asymmetric dissociations to CF + I and CFI + F products are all also identified. The findings for parent cations with Z ≥ 3 are wholly new. In all cases, the fragment recoil velocity distributions imply dissociation dynamics in which coulombic repulsive forces play a dominant role. The major photoproducts following dissociation of CFI ions are CF and I, with lesser contributions from the rival CFI + F and CF + I channels. The CF fragment ion images measured at higher incident intensities show a faster velocity sub-group consistent with their formation in tandem with I fragments, from photodissociation of CFI parent ions. The measured velocity distributions of the I fragment ions contain features attributable to CFI photodissociation to CF + I and the images of fragments with mass to charge (m/z) ratio ∼31 show formation of I products that must originate from parent ions with yet higher Z.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85135251397&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2cp02449g; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35904364; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D2CP02449G; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2cp02449g; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/cp/d2cp02449g
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know