Copper oxide nanostructured thin films processed by SILAR for optoelectronic applications
RSC Advances, ISSN: 2046-2069, Vol: 12, Issue: 51, Page: 32853-32884
2022
- 19Citations
- 39Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef10
- Captures39
- Readers39
- 39
Review Description
The lack of high-functioning p-type semiconductor oxide material is one of the critical challenges that face the widespread performance of transparent and flexible electronics. CuO nanostructured thin films are potentially appealing materials for such applications because of their innate p-type semi-conductivity, transparency, non-toxicity, abundant availability, and low-cost fabrication. This review summarizes current research on CuO nanostructured thin films deposited by the SILAR technique. After a brief introduction to the advantages of CuO semiconductor material, diverse approaches for depositing and growing such thin films are discussed. SILAR is one of the simplest deposition techniques in terms of better flexibility of the substrate choice, the capability of large-area fabrication, budget-friendly, deposition of stable and adherent film, low processing temperature for the film fabrication as well as reproducibility. In addition, various fabrication parameters such as types of copper salts, pH of precursors, number of cycles during immersion, annealing of as-deposited films, doping by diverse dopants, and growth temperature affect the rate of fabrication with the structural, electrical, and optical properties of CuO nanostructured thin films, which led the technique unique to study extensively. This review will include the recent progress that has recently been made in different aspects of CuO processed by the SILAR. It will describe the theory, mechanism, and factors affecting SILAR-deposited CuO. Finally, conclusions and perspectives concerning the use of CuO materials in optoelectronic devices will be visualized.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85143071884&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra06303d; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36425156; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D2RA06303D; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d2ra06303d; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/ra/d2ra06303d
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know