Apparently improved energy barrier of Dy(iii) SMMs by adopting the bridging bipyrimidine ligand
CrystEngComm, ISSN: 1466-8033, Vol: 26, Issue: 34, Page: 4657-4668
2024
- 2Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Eight complexes Ln(tfa)(dmpy) (Ln = Gd 1, Dy 2, tfa = 1,1,1-trifluoro-2,4-pentanedione dmpy = 4,4′-dimethyl-2,2′-bipyridyl), Ln(tfpa)(dmpy) (Ln = Gd 3, Dy 4, tfpa = 4,4,4-trifluoro-1-phenyl-1,3-butanedione), [Ln(tfa)](bpyd) (Ln = Gd 5, Dy 6, bpyd = 2,2′-bipyrimidine) and [Ln(tfpa)](bpyd) (Ln = Gd 7, Dy 8) were designed to investigate the influence of magnetic coupling transfer and changes in molecular geometry on the performance of single-molecule magnets (SMMs). The single-crystal X-ray diffraction results show that Ln(tfa)(dmpy) and Ln(tfpa)(dmpy) are mononuclear, while [Ln(tfa)](bpyd) and [Ln(tfpa)](bpyd) are binuclear complexes with bipyrimidine acting as bridging ligands. The Ln ions in these complexes are octahedral structures. Direct current (dc) susceptibility data indicate that bipyrimidine can effectively transfer the magnetic exchange of two Ln ions. The results of alternating current (AC) magnetization characterization reveal that the magnetic exchange of adjacent Dy ions can obviously suppress the quantum tunneling effect. Therefore, complexes 2 and 4 display weak magnetic relaxation with the absence of peaks. Comparatively, complexes 6 and 8 exhibit distinct slow magnetic relaxation behaviors under the same conditions, with U values of 319.38 and 173.18 K, respectively. Theoretical calculations suggest that the weak Dy-Dy dipole-dipole interaction in complex 6 can effectively hinder the magnetic quantum tunneling in the lowest four Kramers doublets (KDs) of Dy fragments. Consequently, the U value of complex 6 is notably higher than that of complex 8. These findings could provide insights for achieving higher energy barriers in binuclear Dy compounds.
Bibliographic Details
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know