In situ SEM fatigue testing technology for metallic materials: a review
Nanoscale, ISSN: 2040-3372, Vol: 16, Issue: 28, Page: 13300-13330
2024
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Review Description
Fatigue failure is one of the most common fracture modes of structural materials in the industrial field. The study of material fatigue mechanisms and methods for predicting fatigue life has always been of significant interest to researchers due to the abrupt and catastrophic failure mode. In recent decades, the performance and functionality of scanning electron microscopy (SEM) have been continuously improved and expanded. Based on this, the development of in situ fatigue testing in SEM has been rapidly developed. This technology plays a crucial role in providing insights into the deformation behavior of materials under fatigue. Keeping this in view, a comprehensive review of the development and application methods of in situ SEM fatigue testing technology is provided here. The development of in situ SEM fatigue testing devices is provided in brief overview, and the application and research progress of this technology in some representative metal structural materials (nickel-based single-crystal superalloys, steel, aluminum alloys and additive manufacturing materials) are analyzed in detail. Moreover, the perspectives on evaluating fatigue damage, particularly about small cracks and the plastic accumulations fatigue behavior, are presented in this study, utilizing the latest advancements in in situ SEM fatigue testing. Remarks about the present and outlook for future work to be done are then provided.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85198103018&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d4nr01568a; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38965862; https://xlink.rsc.org/?DOI=D4NR01568A; https://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d4nr01568a; https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/nr/d4nr01568a
Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know