Efficacy of cytokine gene transfection may differ for autologous and allogeneic tumour cell vaccines
Immunology, ISSN: 0019-2805, Vol: 102, Issue: 2, Page: 190-198
2001
- 19Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef10
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Whole tumour cells are a logical basis for generating immunity against the cancers they comprise or represent. A number of human trials have been initiated using cytokine-transfected whole tumour cells of autologous (patient-derived) or allogeneic [major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-disparate] origin as vaccines. Although precedent exists for the efficacy of autologous-transfected cell vaccines in animal models, little preclinical evidence confirms that these findings will extrapolate to allogeneic-transfected cell vaccines. In order to address this issue a murine melanoma cell line (K1735) was transfected to secrete interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-7 or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF); cytokines currently in use in trials. The efficacy of these cells as irradiated vaccines was tested head-to-head in syngeneic (C3H) mice and in MHC-disparate (C57BL/6) mice, the former being subsequently challenged with K1735 cells and the latter with naturally cross-reactive B16-F10 melanoma cells. Whilst the GM-CSF-secreting vaccine was the most effective at generating protection in C3H mice, little enhancement in protection above the wild-type vaccine was seen with any of the transfections for the allogeneic vaccines, even though the wild-type vaccine was more effective than the autologous B16-F10 vaccine. Anti-tumour cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) activity was detected in both models but did not correlate well with protection, whilst in vitro anti-tumour interferon-γ (IFN-γ) secretion tended to be higher following the GM-CSF-secreting vaccine. Cytokine transfection of vaccines generally increased anti-tumour CTL activity and IFN-γ secretion (T helper type 1 response). Further studies in other model systems are required to confirm this apparent lack of benefit of cytokine transduction over wild-type allogeneic vaccines, and to determine which in vitro assays will correlate best with protection in vivo.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035106972&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01176.x; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11260324; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01176.x; https://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01176.x; https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1365-2567.2001.01176.x
Wiley
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know