Radio continuum size evolution of star-forming galaxies over 0.35 < z < 2.25
Astronomy and Astrophysics, ISSN: 1432-0746, Vol: 625
2019
- 38Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To better constrain the physical mechanisms driving star formation, we present the first systematic study of the radio continuum size evolution of star-forming galaxies (SFGs) over the redshift range 0.35< z< 2.25. We use the VLA COSMOS 3 GHz map (noise rms=2.3μJybeam-1, θbeam=0.75arcsec) to construct a mass-complete sample of 3184 radio-selected SFGs that reside on and above the main sequence (MS) of SFGs. We constrain the overall extent of star formation activity in galaxies by applying a 2D Gaussian model to their radio continuum emission. Extensive Monte Carlo simulations are used to validate the robustness of our measurements and characterize the selection function. We find no clear dependence between the radio size and stellar mass, M⋆ , of SFGs with 10.5 ≲log(M⋆ /M) ≲11.5. Our analysis suggests that MS galaxies are preferentially extended, while SFGs above the MS are always compact. The median effective radius of SFGs on (above) the MS of Reff=1.5±0.2 (1.0±0.2) kpc remains nearly constant with cosmic time; a parametrization of the form Reff ∝(1+z)α yields a shallow slope of only α=-0.26±0.08(0.12±0.14) for SFGs on (above) the MS. The size of the stellar component of galaxies is larger than the extent of the radio continuum emission by a factor ∼2 (1.3) at z=0.5(2), indicating star formation is enhanced at small radii. The galactic-averaged star formation rate surface density (ςSFR) scales with the distance to the MS, except for a fraction of MS galaxies (≲ 10%) that harbor starburst-like ςSFR. These "hidden"starbursts might have experienced a compaction phase due to disk instability and/or a merger-driven burst of star formation, which may or may not significantly offset a galaxy from the MS. We thus propose to use ςSFR and distance to the MS in conjunction to better identify the galaxy population undergoing a starbursting phase.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85069468789&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935178; https://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935178; https://www.aanda.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935178/pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935178; https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/full_html/2019/05/aa35178-19/aa35178-19.html
EDP Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know