Regional modeling of atmospheric mercury: Impact of meteorological variables
E3S Web of Conferences, ISSN: 2267-1242, Vol: 1
2013
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
Conference Paper Description
The atmospheric mercury concentration in Europe was simulated with the regional atmospheric chemistry transport model CMAQ-Hg. Two sets of meteorological fields, one from MM5 and one from COSMO-CLM (CCLM) were used to drive the model. The results differ significantly, in particular gaseous elemental mercury (Hg0) concentrations are much lower in the run with meteorological fields from MM5 compared to the run with CCLM meteorology. Looking at the mercury sinks within the model domain, it was found that dry deposition of Hg0 is the main sink in both model runs. Remarkably, dry deposition velocities are much higher when calculated with MM5 meteorological fields. Wet deposition of oxidized mercury is a factor of 5-6 lower than dry deposition of Hg0. In CMAQ with MM5 meteorology wet deposition is about afactor of two higher compared to the run with CCLM.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85016475686&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006; http://www.e3s-conferences.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006; http://www.e3s-conferences.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006/pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20130127006; https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2013/01/e3sconf_ichm13_27006/e3sconf_ichm13_27006.html
EDP Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know