The cardiovascular paradox of pregnancy
Medecine/Sciences, ISSN: 0767-0974, Vol: 23, Issue: 11, Page: 944-949
2007
- 6Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef5
- Captures27
- Readers27
- 25
Review Description
Despite widespread accessibility to prenatal care, little is known on the mechanisms initiating early maternal adaptation to pregnancy. Moreover, preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation remain the most frequent and serious complications of pregnancy. Recent studies, both in humans and in laboratory animals, have shown that very early events in gestation may be important determinants for the continuation of healthy pregnancy. Certain of these early adaptations appear to be linked to the corpus luteum of pregnancy, as ovarian steroid hormones (especially progesterone) would set the basic hemodynamic conditions, more specifically, generalized vasodilation. This new hemodynamic setup initiates a vicious cycle in which the renin - angiotensin - aldosterone system is activated, together with the resetting of the control of antidiuretic hormone secretion relative to plasma osmolality. This leads to a gradual and substantial increase in plasma volume and a parallel increase in cardiac function (both heart rate and stroke volume) with the goal of maintaining blood pressure in the face of the generalised vasodilation. This includes the creation of a functional arterio-venous shunt represented by the utero-placental circulation. By the end of the first trimester, the decrease in peripheral vascular resistance is marked relative to the increase in cardiac output, resulting in a significant decrease in blood pressure that will be maintained until the third trimester. It is proposed that in preeclampsia, these very early events (vasodilation - increased plasma volume) fail to occur, resulting in an absence of the usual decrease in blood pressure, which is normally seen in the second trimester of pregnancy, and hypertension in the third trimester. Experimental animals, especially the rat, are suitable models to study this early maternal adaptation to pregnancy, since both endocrine and hemodynamic changes appear to be similar to humans.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=36549080097&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20072311944; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18021705; http://www.medecinesciences.org/10.1051/medsci/20072311944; https://dx.doi.org/10.1051/medsci/20072311944; https://www.medecinesciences.org/articles/medsci/full_html/2007/12/medsci20072311p944/medsci20072311p944.html
EDP Sciences
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know