PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

KDOQI US Commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of CKD

American Journal of Kidney Diseases, ISSN: 0272-6386, Vol: 63, Issue: 5, Page: 713-735
2014
  • 1,370
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 1,942
    Captures
  • 16
    Mentions
  • 16
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    1,370
    • Citation Indexes
      1,354
    • Policy Citations
      15
      • Policy Citation
        15
    • Clinical Citations
      1
      • PubMed Guidelines
        1
  • Captures
    1,942
  • Mentions
    16
    • News Mentions
      16
      • News
        16
  • Social Media
    16
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      16
      • Facebook
        16

Most Recent News

Machine learning models predict the progression of long-term renal insufficiency in patients with renal cancer after radical nephrectomy

Abstract Background Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a common severe complication after radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cancer. The timely and accurate prediction of

Article Description

The National Kidney Foundation–Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-KDOQI) guideline for evaluation, classification, and stratification of chronic kidney disease (CKD) was published in 2002. The KDOQI guideline was well accepted by the medical and public health communities, but concerns and criticisms arose as new evidence became available since the publication of the original guidelines. KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) recently published an updated guideline to clarify the definition and classification of CKD and to update recommendations for the evaluation and management of individuals with CKD based on new evidence published since 2002. The primary recommendations were to retain the current definition of CKD based on decreased glomerular filtration rate or markers of kidney damage for 3 months or more and to include the cause of kidney disease and level of albuminuria, as well as level of glomerular filtration rate, for CKD classification. NKF-KDOQI convened a work group to write a commentary on the KDIGO guideline in order to assist US practitioners in interpreting the KDIGO guideline and determining its applicability within their own practices. Overall, the commentary work group agreed with most of the recommendations contained in the KDIGO guidelines, particularly the recommendations regarding the definition and classification of CKD. However, there were some concerns about incorporating the cause of disease into CKD classification, in addition to certain recommendations for evaluation and management.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know