Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Fatigue in Patients on Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, ISSN: 0272-6386, Vol: 71, Issue: 3, Page: 327-343
2018
- 81Citations
- 159Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations81
- Citation Indexes79
- 79
- CrossRef22
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures159
- Readers159
- 159
- Mentions2
- Blog Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent Blog
Highlights from the March 2018 Issue
March 2018 Editor’s Note: In an effort to improve the understanding of Original Investigation articles published in AJKD, we asked authors to provide short nontechnical summaries that would briefly summarize what inspired their study, the basic approach taken, what was learned, and why it matters. We hope our readers will find this service valuable in helping them to keep up with the latest resear
Article Description
Fatigue is a prevalent and debilitating symptom in patients receiving hemodialysis. We aimed to identify and evaluate the characteristics and psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for fatigue in patients receiving hemodialysis, to inform the selection of a robust and feasible measure for use in randomized trials in hemodialysis. Systematic review of outcome measures for fatigue. Patients receiving hemodialysis. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL from inception to April 2017 were searched for all studies that reported fatigue in patients receiving hemodialysis. With a focus on addressing methods, items (individual questions) from all measures were categorized into content and measurement dimensions of fatigue. We assessed the general characteristics (eg, number of items and cost) and psychometric properties of all measures. From 123 studies, we identified 43 different measures: 24 (55%) were developed specifically for the hemodialysis population (of which 18 were nonvalidated author-developed measures for use in their study only), 17 (40%) for other populations, and 2 (5%) for chronic kidney disease (all stages). The measures assessed 11 content dimensions of fatigue, the 3 most frequent being level of energy (19 [44%]), tiredness (15 [35%]), and life participation (14 [33%]); and 4 measurement dimensions: severity (34 [79%]), frequency (10 [23%]), duration (4 [9%]), and change (1 [2%]). The vitality subscale of the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was the most frequently used (19 [15%] studies), but has only been tested for reliability in hemodialysis. Of the fatigue-specific measures, the Chalder Fatigue Scale was the only one evaluated in hemodialysis, but the full psychometric robustness remains uncertain. For feasibility, we searched for validation studies in the hemodialysis population using the names of measures identified in the primary search strategy. A very wide range of measures have been used to assess fatigue in patients receiving hemodialysis, each varying in content and length. Many have limited validation data available in this population. A standardized and psychometrically robust measure that captures dimensions of fatigue that are important to patients is needed to estimate and improve this disabling complication of hemodialysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638617309502; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.019; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85036521900&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29198388; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272638617309502; https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.08.019; https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(17)30950-2/fulltext#.XMRD-peI7RM.twitter; http://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272638617309502/abstract; http://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272638617309502/fulltext; http://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272638617309502/pdf; https://www.ajkd.org/article/S0272-6386(17)30950-2/abstract
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know