Dialyzer Performance During Hemodialysis Without Systemic Anticoagulation Using a Heparin-Grafted Dialyzer Combined With a Citrate-Enriched Dialysate: Results of the Randomized Crossover Noninferiority EvoCit Study
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, ISSN: 0272-6386, Vol: 79, Issue: 1, Page: 79-87.e1
2022
- 13Citations
- 34Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 34
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent Blog
Highlights From the January 2022 Issue
Editor’s Note: We asked authors of Original Investigations to provide short plain-language summaries that would briefly summarize what inspired their study, the basic approach taken, what was learned, and why it matters. We hope our readers will find this valuable in helping them keep up with the latest research in the field of nephrology. From the January 2022 issue: Coffee and Caffeine Consumpti
Article Description
The EvoCit study was designed to evaluate performance of a heparin-grafted dialyzer during hemodialysis with and without systemic anticoagulation. Randomized, crossover, noninferiority trial. Noninferiority was defined as a difference of ≤10% for the primary outcome. Single hemodialysis center; 26 prevalent patients treated with 617 hemodialysis sessions. Hemodialysis using a heparin-grafted dialyzer combined with a 1.0 mmol/L citrate-enriched dialysate (“EvoCit”) without systemic anticoagulation compared with hemodialysis performed with a heparin-grafted dialyzer with systemic heparin (“EvoHep”). Patients were randomly allocated to a first period of 4 weeks and crossed over to the alternative strategy for a second period of 4 weeks. The primary end point was the difference in Kt/V urea between EvoCit and EvoHep. Secondary end points were urea reduction ratio, middle molecule removal, treatment time, thrombin generation, and reduction in dialyzer blood compartment volume. The estimated difference in Kt/V urea between EvoCit and EvoHep was −0.03 (95% CI, −0.06 to −0.007), establishing noninferiority with mean Kt/V urea of 1.47 ± 0.05 (SE) for EvoCit and 1.50 ± 0.05 for EvoHep. Noninferiority was also established for reduction ratios of urea and β 2 -microglobulin. Premature discontinuation of dialysis was required for 4.2% of sessions among 6 patients during EvoCit and no sessions during EvoHep. Effective treatment time was 236 ± 5 minutes for EvoCit and 238 ± 1 minutes for EvoHep. Thrombin generation was increased and there was greater reduction in dialyzer blood compartment volume after treatments with EvoCit compared with EvoHep. The effects of avoiding systemic anticoagulation on clinical outcomes were not evaluated. EvoCit is noninferior to EvoHep with respect to solute clearance but results in a greater number of shortened treatments, more membrane clotting, and greater thrombin generation Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with study number NCT03887468.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272638621005734; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.04.004; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108791796&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33940113; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03887468; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272638621005734; https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.04.004
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know