PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Cardiac and Kidney Adverse Effects of HIF Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors for Anemia in Patients With CKD Not Receiving Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

American Journal of Kidney Diseases, ISSN: 0272-6386, Vol: 81, Issue: 4, Page: 434-445.e1
2023
  • 13
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 19
    Captures
  • 4
    Mentions
  • 34
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    13
  • Captures
    19
  • Mentions
    4
    • News Mentions
      2
      • News
        2
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1
    • References
      1
      • Wikipedia
        1
  • Social Media
    34
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      34
      • Facebook
        34

Most Recent Blog

Highlights from the April 2023 Issue

Editor’s Note: We asked authors of Original Investigations to provide short plain-language summaries that would briefly summarize what inspired their study, the basic approach taken, what was learned, and why it matters. We hope our readers will find this valuable in helping them keep up with the latest research in the field of nephrology. The April 2023 issue will be freely available until April

Most Recent News

Meta-analysis of HIF-PHIs versus ESAs or Placebo in CKD With Anemia

Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) often experience anemia, a complication associated with increased incidence of cardiovascular disease, hospitalizations, and mortality The current mainstays of

Article Description

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are novel, orally administered agents for anemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated the cardiac and kidney-related adverse effects of HIF-PHIs among patients with CKD and anemia. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Patients with anemia and CKD not receiving maintenance dialysis. RCTs comparing HIF-PHIs to placebo or an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) with primary outcomes of cardiac and kidney-related adverse events (AEs). Two independent reviewers evaluated RCTs for eligibility and extracted relevant data. Dichotomous variables were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method and presented as risk ratios (RRs). Subgroup analyses evaluated different intervention times and HIF-PHIs, as well as phase 2 versus phase 3 trials. The certainty of findings was rated according to GRADE criteria. Twenty-three studies with 15,144 participants were included. No significant difference in the risk of cardiac AEs was observed between the HIF-PHIs group and the placebo (RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.89-1.16]; moderate certainty) or ESA (RR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.98-1.14]; low certainty) groups. No significant difference in the risk of kidney-related AEs was observed between the HIF-PHIs group and the placebo (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.98-1.20]; moderate certainty) or ESA (RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.94-1.06]; low certainty) groups. The occurrence of hypertension and hyperkalemia was higher in the HIF-PHIs group than in the placebo group (RRs of 1.35 [95% CI, 1.14-1.60] and 1.25 [95% CI, 1.03-1.51], respectively; both findings had high certainty). The occurrence of hypertension was lower in the HIF-PHIs group than in the ESA group (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]; moderate certainty). The reporting criteria of cardiac and kidney-related AEs and dosage of HIF-PHIs were inconsistent across trials. The occurrence of cardiac or kidney-related AEs in the HIF-PHI groups were not different compared with placebo or ESA groups. Registered at PROSPERO with registration number CRD42021228243.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know