Correlation of Loss of Correction With Postoperative Radiological Factors After Distal Chevron Osteotomy in Dependence of Concomitant Akin Osteotomy
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, ISSN: 1067-2516, Vol: 61, Issue: 4, Page: 785-791
2022
- 5Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Loss of correction is frequently observed following hallux valgus correction and is associated with recurrence of a hallux valgus deformity. The purpose of this study was to correlate loss of correction and radiological parameters following distal chevron (Group C) and combined chevron/akin (Group AC) osteotomy. A total of 859 feet were included for analysis and grouped according to treatment with a distal chevron osteotomy alone or a combined chevron/akin osteotomy. Radiographs were evaluated preoperatively, postoperatively, after 6 weeks, 3 months and, if available, at long term follow-up with a mean of 34.2 (range 7.5-155.3) months. With the exception of the proximal to distal phalangeal articular angle (PDPAA), preoperative deformity was comparable between both groups. Significant correction of all examined parameters ( p <.001) was seen. Loss of correction at 6 weeks with minor deterioration until follow-up was also detected, with group AC somewhat better than Group C. A strong correlation with loss of correction was found for the postoperative hallux valgus angle (HVA) ( p <.002), intermetatarsal angle (IMA) ( p <.001), distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) ( p <.002), positioning of the sesamoids ( p <.002) and joint congruity ( p <.035) in Group C and for the DMAA ( p <.033) and HVA ( p <.046) in Group AC. Multiple postoperative radiological parameters correlated with loss of correction following distal chevron osteotomy. In Group AC only postoperative HVA and DMAA determined loss of correction. Correction of the deformity in Group AC showed greater stability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106725162100483X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.11.017; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121976668&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34973863; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S106725162100483X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.11.017
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know