No Loss of Strength After Insertional Achilles Tendon Reconstruction With Single-Anchor or Double-Row Repair
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, ISSN: 1067-2516, Vol: 63, Issue: 1, Page: 22-26
2024
- 2Usage
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
Many different types of surgical repair for insertional Achilles tendinosis have been described. Strength after surgery is an essential factor for patient function and satisfaction. A retrospective series of patients that underwent surgery for insertional Achilles tendon surgery were contacted to come in for prospective strength testing, with the tester blinded to the type of surgery performed. Thirty-seven patients came in for testing, 24 with a single-anchor repair and 13 with a double-row repair. Strength of plantarflexion was tested at 60°/s and 120°/s and was compared. First each operative leg was compared to the nonoperative leg as a control. Then the percentage change, or symmetry, from the control leg to the operative leg was compared between those with a single-anchor and double-row repair. Satisfaction was also assessed with a simple questionnaire and compared the types of repair. The results demonstrated there was no statistically significant change in strength after surgery compared to the nonoperative leg, and there was no difference in limb symmetry between types of repair. Similarly, there was no difference between the groups in satisfaction. Our study showed that there is, on average, no loss of strength after insertional Achilles tendon surgery at an average follow-up of nearly 2 years, regardless of type of repair.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067251623001928; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2023.08.005; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85171176892&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37597583; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1067251623001928; https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/allother/610; https://institutionalrepository.aah.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1612&context=allother; https://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2023.08.005
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know