Quo Vadis, ECMO? Multidisciplinary Hybrid Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rounds During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, ISSN: 1053-0770, Vol: 38, Issue: 11, Page: 2546-2551
2024
- 9Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures9
- Readers9
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Researchers from Mayo Clinic Detail Findings in COVID-19 (Quo Vadis, Ecmo? Multidisciplinary Hybrid Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rounds During the Covid-19 Pandemic)
2024 NOV 12 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx COVID-19 Daily -- Research findings on Coronavirus - COVID-19 are discussed in
Article Description
The complex care of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires a high level of collaboration between multiple medical specialties and allied health professionals. Effective and timely communication between team members is imperative in ensuring patient safety. The COVID-19 pandemic posed unique challenges in the care of patients on ECMO. Communication between team members was complicated by social distancing recommendations, increased patient volume, and staff turnover. In this article, we describe a hybrid approach to rounds that allowed team members to attend virtually or in-person to improve team communication. Weekly hybrid ECMO rounds were held to discuss patient cases and work collectively to establish patient centered goals for the following week. Critical care and surgical consultants, registered nurse ECMO specialists, RNs, perfusionists, respiratory therapists, physical and occupational therapists, pharmacists, ethics committee members, and patient family members were invited to attend hybrid ECMO rounds. After eight months of rounds, medical care team members were asked to provide feedback regarding the rounds format, strengths, and weaknesses. The most frequently identified strengths were improved multidisciplinary communication and continuity of care. This article demonstrates that hybrid virtual and in-person patient rounds are a feasible way for ECMO programs to improve team communication and overall patient care.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077024005123; http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2024.07.049; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85203411561&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39242264; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053077024005123
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know