Deep learning radiomics of multimodal ultrasound for classifying metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy into primary cancer sites: a feasibility study
Ultraschall in der Medizin, ISSN: 1438-8782, Vol: 45, Issue: 3, Page: 305-315
2024
- 1Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
Purpose To investigate the feasibility of deep learning radiomics (DLR) based on multimodal ultrasound to differentiate the primary cancer sites of metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy (CLA). Materials and Methods This study analyzed 280 biopsy-confirmed metastatic CLAs from 280 cancer patients, including 54 from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), 58 from thyroid cancer (TC), 92 from lung cancer (LC), and 76 from gastrointestinal cancer (GIC). Before biopsy, patients underwent conventional ultrasound (CUS), ultrasound elastography (UE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Based on CUS, DLR models using CUS, CUS+UE, CUS+CEUS, and CUS+UE+CEUS data were developed and compared. The best model was integrated with key clinical indicators selected by univariate analysis to achieve the best classification performance. Results All DLR models achieved similar performance with respect to classifying four primary tumor sites of metastatic CLA (AUC:0.708~0.755). After integrating key clinical indicators (age, sex, and neck level), the US+UE+CEUS+clinical model yielded the best performance with an overall AUC of 0.822 in the validation cohort, but there was no significance compared with the basal CUS+clinical model (P>0.05), both of which identified metastasis from HNSCC, TC, LC, and GIC with 0.869 and 0.911, 0.838 and 0.916, 0.750 and 0.610, and 0.829 and 0.769, respectively. Conclusion The ultrasound-based DLR model can be used to classify the primary cancer sites of metastatic CLA, and the CUS combined with clinical indicators is adequate to provide a high discriminatory performance. The addition of the combination of UE and CEUS data is expected to further improve performance.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85179704526&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2161-9369; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38052240; http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2161-9369; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2161-9369; https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2161-9369
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know