Evaluation von neuen Versorgungsformen für Menschen mit psychischen Erkrankungen: Pro & Contra zum Einsatz von GKV-Routinedaten - Ein Erfahrungsbericht
Gesundheitswesen, ISSN: 1439-4421, Vol: 86, Issue: S 03, Page: S212-S223
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The article presents the special features of an evaluation within mental health services research in Germany. The experiences of the evaluation of flexible and integrated treatment options with a global treatment budget in psychiatric hospitals based on routine data of more than 70 statutory health insurance (SHI) funds (EVA64 study) are systematically presented. Using the EVA64 study as an example, recommendations for the use of claims data in the field of mental health services research and in general are derived. (1) First, the study and the use of claims data in this study is described and classified. (2) Then, the individual outcomes of the study are presented and evaluated to (3) derive criteria, strengths and potential uses of claims data. (4) Finally, recommendations for the further development of claims data from SHI funds as a basis for evaluation are described.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189870607&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2297-5347; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38565206; http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/a-2297-5347; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-2297-5347; https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/a-2297-5347
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know