Biocatalytic One-Carbon Transfer - A Review
Synthesis (Germany), ISSN: 1437-210X, Vol: 54, Issue: 20, Page: 4401-4425
2022
- 9Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
This review provides an overview of different Cbuilding blocks as substrates of enzymes, or part of their cofactors, and the resulting functionalized products. There is an emphasis on the broad range of possibilities of biocatalytic one-carbon extensions with Csources of different oxidation states. The identification of uncommon biosynthetic strategies, many of which might serve as templates for synthetic or biotechnological applications, towards one-carbon extensions is supported by recent genomic and metabolomic progress and hence we refer principally to literature spanning from 2014 to 2020. 1 Introduction 2 Methane, Methanol, and Methylamine 3 Glycine 4 Nitromethane 5 SAM and SAM Ylide 6 Other CBuilding Blocks 7 Formaldehyde and Glyoxylate as Formaldehyde Equivalents 8 Cyanide 9 Formic Acid 10 Formyl-CoA and Oxalyl-CoA 11 Carbon Monoxide 12 Carbon Dioxide 13 Conclusions.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85136020117&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1719884; http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0040-1719884; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1719884; https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0040-1719884
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know