A Critical Analysis of Rectal Biopsy to Exclude Hirschsprung's Disease
European Journal of Pediatric Surgery, ISSN: 1439-359X, Vol: 32, Issue: 2, Page: 184-190
2022
- 3Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef2
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Article Description
Introduction Most Hirschsprung's disease (HD) are diagnosed in young children with increased risk (red flag). Older children (>6 months) require open rectal biopsy (ORB) with its own impact on risk and resources. We investigated if red flag, age, and sex used in combination could exclude HD. Materials and Methods Red flags are risk factors associated with HD, including neonatal bowel obstruction, genetic association, failure of passage of meconium in <48 hours, infantile constipation, distension with vomiting, or family history. All rectal biopsies (2015-2018) were reviewed for indications, methods, and histopathological findings. Logistic regression analysis was adopted to assess predictive value of red flag, age, and sex (p < 0.05∗ was significant). Results A total of 187 children underwent 84 suction rectal biopsies and 113 ORBs (n = 197 in total). Final histopathological diagnoses were non-HD (n = 154) and HD (n = 43). Total 78% of rectal biopsies were non-HD, of which 63% by ORB. Non-HD was associated with absence of red flag (49 vs. 16%*), increased age at biopsy (22 months vs. 28 days*), >6 months old (62 vs. 30%*), and female gender (54 vs. 16%*), compared with HD. In the absence of red flag, 7/82 (9%) had HD (negative predictive value = 91%). Logistic regression analysis found absent red flag predicted non-HD biopsy with odds ratio 4.77 (1.38, 16.47), corrected for age and sex. Conclusion Negative rectal biopsy rate for HD is very high. The majority required ORB. Although red flag and gender, but not age, have strong predictive values, it is inadequate for excluding HD. This study supports the need for alternative strategies in excluding HD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85101106255&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1722858; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33550578; http://www.thieme-connect.de/DOI/DOI?10.1055/s-0041-1722858; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1722858; https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0041-1722858
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know