Evaluation and Comparison of Respiratory Muscular Strength, Functionality, and Pelvic Floor in the Immediate Postpartum of Normal and Cesarean Birth
Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, ISSN: 0100-7203, Vol: 45, Issue: 3, Page: 121-126
2022
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Objective: To evaluate and compare peripheral, pelvic floor, respiratory muscle strength, and functionality in the immediate puerperium of normal delivery and cesarean section. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that verified respiratory, pelvic floor, peripheral, and functional muscle strength through manovacuometry, pelvic floor functional assessment (PFF), dynamometry, and the Time Up and Go (TUG) test, respectively. The groups were divided according to the type of delivery, into a cesarean section group and a normal parturition group. Results: The sample was composed of 72 postpartum puerperae, 36 of normal parturition, and 36 of cesarean section, evaluated before hospital discharge, mean age ranged from 25.56 ± 6.28 and 28.57 ± 6.47 years in puerperae of normal parturition and cesarean section respectively. Cesarean showed higher pelvic floor strength (PFF) compared to normal parturition (p < 0.002), but puerperae from normal delivery showed better functionality (p < 0.001). As for peripheral muscle strength and respiratory muscle strength, there was no significance when comparing the types of parturirion. Conclusion: There is a reduction in pelvic muscle strength in puerperae of normal delivery and a decrease in functionality in puerperae of cesarean section.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85156111388&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768457; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37105195; https://journalrbgo.org/article/evaluation-and-comparison-of-respiratory-muscular-strength-functionality-and-pelvic-floor-in-the-immediate-postpartum-of-normal-and-cesarean-birth/; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000300121&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72032023000300121&lng=en&tlng=en; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-72032023000300121; http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S0100-72032023000300121; https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1768457; https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0043-1768457
Federação das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know