The acute respiratory distress syndrome
New England Journal of Medicine, ISSN: 1533-4406, Vol: 332, Issue: 1, Page: 27-37
1995
- 541Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations541
- Citation Indexes541
- 541
- CrossRef418
- Captures9
- Readers9
Review Description
In this review we evaluate specific therapeutic strategies for the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and make recommendations on their use. We begin with a brief overview of the laboratory tests used to evaluate suspected cases of the syndrome, because these often dictate the subsequent therapeutic approaches. The clinical features, pathogenesis, and pathologic features of ARDS have been reviewed extensively elsewhere.– We recognize that the understanding of ARDS and its optimal clinical management will continue to advance and that our recommendations will therefore be modified. Definition of ARDS The recent European–American Consensus Conference on ARDS developed the following… © 1995, Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
Massachusetts Medical Society
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know