Innovation: The new big push or the post-development alternative?
Development (Basingstoke), ISSN: 1461-7072, Vol: 56, Issue: 2, Page: 223-226
2013
- 32Citations
- 48Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The purpose of this article is to raise a question rather than to provide an answer. The topic of the question is the sudden popularity of the term 'innovation' in the development discourse - even though the term is used in a fuzzy manner, and without any attempt at agreeing on a clear definition. To interpret the impact of this term, I draw attention to two other terms that were prominent in the development literature at earlier times: Big Push and Post-Development. Early on, a Big Push was presented as the solution for underdeveloped countries; it became more than a concept, as a code word for the aid industry. Failure and lasting challenges generating several critiques, of which I single out Post-Development theory as the one that challenged both the paradigm and the performance of mainstream development. This article seeks to provoke a discussion of whether innovation is the new orthodoxy, that is, the pursuit of conventional development by other means, or whether it has the potential of forming a new critique, a basis for rethinking and recasting development. © 2013 Society for International Development 1011-6370/13.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84890947104&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/dev.2013.29; http://link.springer.com/10.1057/dev.2013.29; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/dev.2013.29; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/dev.2013.29.pdf; http://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/dev.2013.29/fulltext.html; https://dx.doi.org/10.1057/dev.2013.29; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/dev.2013.29
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know