Customer feature selection from high-dimensional bank direct marketing data for uplift modeling
Journal of Marketing Analytics, ISSN: 2050-3326, Vol: 11, Issue: 2, Page: 160-171
2023
- 3Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Uplift modeling estimates the incremental impact (i.e., uplift) of a marketing campaign on customer outcomes. These models are essential to banks’ direct marketing efforts. However, bank data are often high-dimensional, with hundreds to thousands of customer features; and keeping irrelevant and redundant features in an uplift model can be computationally inefficient and adversely affect model performance. Therefore, banks must narrow their feature selection for uplift modeling. Yet, literature on feature selection has rarely focused on uplift modeling. This paper proposes several two-step feature selection approaches to uplift models, structured to cluster highly relevant, low-redundant feature subsets from high-dimensional banking data. Empirical experiments show that fewer features in a selected set (20 out of 180 features) lead to 68.6% of these uplift models performing as well or better than complete feature set models.
Bibliographic Details
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know