Improvements in dual-fuel biodiesel-producer gas combustion at low loads through pilot injection splitting
Journal of Energy Engineering, ISSN: 0733-9402, Vol: 141, Issue: 2
2015
- 23Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
In dual-fuel engines, a combustible mixture of air and generally a gaseous fuel is ignited, thanks to the injection and autoignition of a small amount of liquid fuel. It is well-known that dual-fuel engines suffer from poor combustion when operated at low loads. This behavior, due mainly to the presence of an overlean mixture into the combustion chamber, leads to unacceptably high levels of carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons emitted at the exhaust. In order to solve this problem a possible solution could be to split the pilot injection of liquid fuel into two split injections, the second having the function of boosting the combustion of gaseous fuel also during the late combustion phase. In this paper this solution has been implemented on a diesel common rail single cylinder research engine converted to operate in dual-fuel mode. The composition of the gaseous fuel, indirectly injected, simulated a typical producer gas. The liquid fuel used during the experiments was biodiesel, injected by means of a common rail injection system. The first section of results describes the tests run for comparison purposes, performing only one pilot biodiesel injection and varying its timing on a wide range. The second section of results then presents the tests run for different timings, varied on a wide range, of the first split injection, and different dwells between the first and the second injections. The engine behavior has been discussed in terms of heat release rate, fuel conversion efficiency, and nitric oxides, total hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide emission levels at the exhaust. The results demonstrate that splitting the pilot injection leads to an increase of fuel conversion efficiency and a reduction of both total hydrocarbons and carbon monoxide. This final result allows to state that splitting the pilot injection is an effective way for sustaining the gaseous fuel combustion in dual-fuel engine late during the combustion phase.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84929619383&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ey.1943-7897.0000231; http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000231; http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000231; https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29EY.1943-7897.0000231; http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/%28asce%29ey.1943-7897.0000231; https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/%28asce%29ey.1943-7897.0000231
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know