Finite sample breakdown points of outlier detection procedures
Journal of Surveying Engineering, ISSN: 0733-9453, Vol: 123, Issue: 1, Page: 15-31
1997
- 46Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The conventional iterative outlier detection procedures (CIODP), such as the Baarda-, Pope-, or t-testing procedure, based on the least-squares estimation (LSE) are used to detect the outliers in geodesy. Since the finite sample breakdown point (FSBP) of LSE is about 1/n, the FSBPs of the CIODP are also expected to be the same, about 1/n. In this paper, this problem is studied in view of the robust statistics for coordinate transformation with simulated data. Outliers have been examined in two groups: "random" and "jointly influential." Random outliers are divided again into two subgroups: "random scattered" and "adjacent." The single point displacements can be thought of as jointly influential outliers. These are modeled as the shifts along either the x- and y-axis or parallel to any given direction. In addition, each group is divided into two subgroups according to the magnitude of outliers: "small" and "large." The FSBPs of either the Baarda-, Pope-, or t-testing procedure are the same and about 1/n. It means that only one outlier can be determined reliably by CIODP. However, the FSBP of the x-test is zero.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0031079134&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(1997)123:1(15); https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9453%281997%29123%3A1%2815%29; http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9453%281997%29123%3A1%2815%29; http://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%290733-9453%281997%29123%3A1%2815%29; http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/%28asce%290733-9453%281997%29123%3A1%2815%29; https://dx.doi.org/10.1061/%28asce%290733-9453%281997%29123%3A1%2815%29
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know