Utilization of Low Pass Filters for the Calculation of Termination Points for 3D Fabrication Control of Pipe Spools
Computing in Civil Engineering 2021 - Selected Papers from the ASCE International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering 2021, Page: 910-917
2021
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Conference Paper Description
In the context of prefabrication and modularization, termination points are defined as local coordinate systems where assemblies are either connected or constrained. These points are typically points of connection between assemblies, sub-assemblies, or modules. As such, it is critical to ensure that termination points are measured accurately. In this study, the impact of point cloud filtering as a pre-processing step for improving the accuracy of detecting termination points in point clouds is investigated. An industrial-scale experiment was conducted where 3D scans of 40 piping components were collected and analysed while being fabricated. For data collection, each piping object was scanned using a laser scanner as well as a SLAM (simultaneous localization and mapping) scanner (80 point clouds were collected in total). The components vary in their design geometry. Using a guided Hough transform, a circle fitting method was developed to find the termination points in the scanned point clouds. It was then shown that applying noise removal as a pre-processing step for the termination point calculation can substantially improve the accuracy irrespective of the source of acquisition.
Bibliographic Details
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know