Low-stress shock and release wave behavior of porous carbon
Journal of Applied Physics, ISSN: 0021-8979, Vol: 41, Issue: 1, Page: 351-360
1970
- 11Citations
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- CrossRef11
- 11
Article Description
Shock-reverberation techniques and transmitted-wave experiments were used to determine multiple shock states and release adiabats from shock-induced states for a 0.68-g/cm graphite foam and a 1.37 g/cm carbon felt. These experiments indicated that the samples were not compacted to solid density in the 1-3 μsec duration of the stress pulse, even though the peak pressures were well in excess of the quasistatic yield strength of the materials. For the very low-density graphite foam, release adiabats centered at initial shock states between 0.7 and 3.2 kbar were found to be indistinguishable from the principal Hugoniot; whereas for the more dense material, release adiabats centered between 0 and 25 kbar were substantially different from the principal Hugoniot. This seemingly anomalous behavior of the graphite foam is likely due to a separation of the solid portions of the sample from the gauge. A prediction of the distance at which a short stress pulse is overtaken by trailing relief waves is given for the carbon felt. © 1970 The American Institute of Physics.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know