An analysis of premixed flamelet models for large eddy simulation of turbulent combustion
Physics of Fluids, ISSN: 1070-6631, Vol: 22, Issue: 11
2010
- 45Citations
- 60Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
When premixed flamelet models are applied in the context of large eddy simulation, a number of assumptions are implicity made. The validity of these assumptions depends on, for example, the simulated flame's location within the premixed regime diagram, the accuracy of the presumed subfilter flamelet coordinate distributions, and the extent to which the asymptotic flamelets capture the turbulence-perturbed chemistry. Here, the errors that arise due to these assumptions are considered, analyzed, and compared using a direct numerical simulation of a premixed turbulent flame propagating in the thin reaction zones regime. Flamelet representations of the progress variable source term are formed in an a priori fashion. Level set flamelet methods in particular are considered because, although they offer a number of advantages, they make some of the most stringent flame structure assumptions. Errors due to the level set model are evaluated relative to other flamelet error sources, such as the shape of the presumed probability density function and the influence of the variance model. The results provide guidance on the importance of the individual modeling assumptions, and are used to propose a new modeling strategy in an effort to improve the level set framework. © 2010 American Institute of Physics.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know