Comment on "Monte Carlo simulation of the laser-induced plasma plume expansion under vacuum: Comparison with experiments" [J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5075 (1998)]
Journal of Applied Physics, ISSN: 0021-8979, Vol: 86, Issue: 8, Page: 4709-4710
1999
- 3Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
An attempt to use direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) method for pulsed laser ablation at laser fluence as high as 17 J/cm is analyzed. Under these conditions, however, the evaporation flux is very high which results in a very high laser plume density. Therefore, both collision rate and collisional zone near the target are too large to effectively use a conventional DSMC technique whose possibilities are always limited by finite computer storage and available computation time. Nevertheless, the authors of the considered paper claim to propose a new approach to overcome the restrictions of DSMC. We found that the main idea of the approach is the plume reduction in space. However, according to the dimension theory, under this transformation one should preserve the Knudsen number, that defines the degree of rarefaction, and, hence, the number of cells to be used in DSMC. Therefore, the number density of the plume should be increased and particle collisions should be calculated with higher frequency than in the case without space reduction. In our opinion, this important point was neglected by the authors, the collision frequency was not increased, and the number of cells was not properly chosen. As a result, the proposed approach does not break the DSMC restrictions, and the results obtained do not correspond to the experiments with high evaporation flux. © 1999 American Institute of Physics.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know