3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated valves
Biomicrofluidics, ISSN: 1932-1058, Vol: 9, Issue: 1, Page: 016501
2015
- 243Citations
- 382Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations243
- Citation Indexes243
- 243
- CrossRef198
- Captures382
- Readers382
- 382
- Mentions1
- References1
- 1
Article Description
We report the successful fabrication and testing of 3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated membrane-based valves. Fabrication is performed with a low-cost commercially available stereolithographic 3D printer. Horizontal microfluidic channels with designed rectangular cross sectional dimensions as small as 350??m wide and 250??m tall are printed with 100% yield, as are cylindrical vertical microfluidic channels with 350??m designed (210??m actual) diameters. Based on our previous work [Rogers et al., Anal. Chem. 83, 6418 (2011)], we use a custom resin formulation tailored for low non-specific protein adsorption. Valves are fabricated with a membrane consisting of a single build layer. The fluid pressure required to open a closed valve is the same as the control pressure holding the valve closed. 3D printed valves are successfully demonstrated for up to 800 actuations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84923793028&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4905840; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25610517; https://pubs.aip.org/bmf/article/9/1/016501/952100/3D-printed-microfluidic-devices-with-integrated; http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/bmf/9/1/10.1063/1.4905840; http://scitation.aip.org/limit_exceeded.html
AIP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know