Effects of hawkmoth-like flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings with different shapes and aspect ratios
Physics of Fluids, ISSN: 1089-7666, Vol: 30, Issue: 9
2018
- 58Citations
- 38Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The effect of hawkmoth-like flexibility on the aerodynamic hovering performance of wings at a Reynolds number of 400 has been assessed by conducting fluid structure interaction simulations incorporating a finite difference based immersed boundary method coupled with a finite-element based structure solver. The stiffness distribution of a hawkmoth forewing was mapped onto three wing shapes (r¯1 = 0.43, 0.53, and 0.63) defined by the radius of the first moment of wing area each with aspect ratios, AR = 1.5, 2.96, 4.5, and 6.0 using elliptic mesh generation, the Jacobi method for iterations, and the concept of the barycentric coordinate system. The results show that there is a dominant chordwise deformation at AR = 1.5, and the wings also deform in the spanwise direction and their tips deviate from the horizontal stroke plane as AR increases. At AR = 1.5, 2.96, and 4.5, flexibility increases the mean lift (up to 39%, 18%, and 17.6%, respectively) for all wing shapes. At AR = 6.0, the r1¯ = 0.53 and 0.63 flexible wings give lesser lift than the rigid equivalents because of negative lift or small positive lift during the early stroke as the vortical structures remain on the bottom surface. This is attributed to the rapid pitch-down rotation, lesser stroke angular velocity than the rigid wing, and upward motion of the wingtip, away from the horizontal stroke plane. From the design perspective, the anisotropic flexible wings (except r1¯ = 0.53 and 0.63 with AR = 6.0) can be used in micro aerial vehicles for high lift requirements, such as for a high payload. Results here show that in nature, the hawkmoth wings with r1¯ and AR of 0.43-0.44 and 2.73-2.92, respectively, appear to have a combination of the shape, AR, and flexibility that optimizes power economy.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053374317&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5044635; https://pubs.aip.org/pof/article/30/9/091902/1013585/Effects-of-hawkmoth-like-flexibility-on-the; http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5044635; https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.5044635
AIP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know