Accelerating equilibrium isotope effect calculations. II. Stochastic implementation of direct estimators
Journal of Chemical Physics, ISSN: 0021-9606, Vol: 151, Issue: 13, Page: 134116
2019
- 1Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
- Captures5
- Readers5
Article Description
Path integral calculations of equilibrium isotope effects and isotopic fractionation are expensive due to the presence of path integral discretization errors, statistical errors, and thermodynamic integration errors. Whereas the discretization errors can be reduced by high-order factorization of the path integral and statistical errors by using centroid virial estimators, two recent papers proposed alternative ways to completely remove the thermodynamic integration errors: Cheng and Ceriotti [J. Chem. Phys. 141, 244112 (2015)] employed a variant of free-energy perturbation called "direct estimators," while Karandashev and Vaníček [J. Chem. Phys. 143, 194104 (2017)] combined the thermodynamic integration with a stochastic change of mass and piecewise-linear umbrella biasing potential. Here, we combine the former approach with the stochastic change in mass in order to decrease its statistical errors when applied to larger isotope effects and perform a thorough comparison of different methods by computing isotope effects first on a harmonic model and then on methane and methanium, where we evaluate all isotope effects of the form CHD/CH and CH5-xDx+/CH5+, respectively. We discuss the reasons for a surprising behavior of the original method of direct estimators, which performed well for a much larger range of isotope effects than what had been expected previously, as well as some implications of our work for the more general problem of free energy difference calculations.
Bibliographic Details
AIP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know