Microscratch of copper by a Rockwell C diamond indenter under a constant load
Nanotechnology and Precision Engineering, ISSN: 2589-5540, Vol: 4, Issue: 3
2021
- 19Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef9
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Article Description
The scratch test is used for quality control mostly in phenomenological ways, and whether fracture toughness can be obtained from this test is still a matter of debate requiring further elucidation. In this paper, values of the fracture toughness of copper obtained by different scratch-based approaches are compared in order to examine the applicability of scratch-based methodologies to characterize the fracture toughness of soft metals. The scratch response of copper to a Rockwell C diamond indenter is studied under a constant normal load condition. The variations of penetration depth, residual depth, and residual scratch width with applied normal load are quantified from spherical to sphero-conical contact regimes by piecewise functions. A newly proposed size effect law is found to be the most suitable for scratch-based approaches to characterizing the fracture toughness of soft metallic materials with significant plasticity. A simple expression relating the nominal stress to the penetration depth is proposed for the spherical contact regime and gives almost the same value of fracture toughness. The residual scratch width provides useful information on pile-up of material and on the spherical tip radius of the indenter. It is found that the values of the fracture toughness obtained from the microscratch test are influenced by the data range for analysis.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85107285281&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/10.0005065; https://pubs.aip.org/npe/article/4/3/033003/253495/Microscratch-of-copper-by-a-Rockwell-C-diamond; http://sciencechina.cn/gw.jsp?action=cited_outline.jsp&type=1&id=7037448&internal_id=7037448&from=elsevier
AIP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know