Design and performance of a hyperspectral camera for full-face in vivo imaging
Review of Scientific Instruments, ISSN: 1089-7623, Vol: 92, Issue: 5, Page: 055108
2021
- 6Citations
- 6Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef2
- Captures6
- Readers6
Article Description
Red, green, blue color photography is a mature technology and a powerful tool for the evaluation and understanding of the way an object reflects light and its related optical properties, but color photography fails to give a complete picture of these effects due to its inherent lack of spectral resolution. In this work, we update the L'OREAL reference device for skin color measurement, the Chromasphere, by replacing its current color camera system with an imaging spectrometer. This imaging spectrometer must provide a spatial resolution on par with the previous color cameras and a spectral resolution commensurate with a spectroradiometer while also achieving a time resolution suitable for in vivo studies of the human face. Due to these requirements, common spatial scanning techniques are not suitable for this application, and so we utilized a spectral-scanning approach based on a tunable liquid-crystal birefringent filter. We present the design and performance tests of a working prototype that is capable of measuring the spectrum in each of 4 MP with a nominal spectral resolution of 10 nm across the wavelength range from 420 to 730 nm in a total imaging time of less than 10 s. We cross-compared the spectral and color measurements obtained with this prototype, an industry-standard spectroradiometer, and a charge-coupled device color camera in order to assess the prototype's performance, and the results of this comparison show that our prototype is capable of taking spectral measurements near enough in quality to those of a spectroradiometer to successfully bridge the divide between such devices and conventional color cameras. Doing so, this instrument opens new possibilities for studies of complex in vivo phenomena that neither non-imaging spectrometers nor conventional cameras can pursue.
Bibliographic Details
AIP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know