Improvement of the free-interaction theory for shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions
Physics of Fluids, ISSN: 1089-7666, Vol: 33, Issue: 7
2021
- 22Citations
- 14Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Free-interaction theory is widely used for the analysis and modeling of the flow structure for shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions (SWTBLIs). However, many studies have demonstrated that the value of the nondimensional pressure rise function at the plateau should not be treated as a universal constant, which is an assumption taken in the traditional free-interaction theory. Such an assumption brings huge uncertainty to the theoretical prediction of shock wave/boundary layer interaction flows. To improve the accuracy of free-interaction theory, numerical simulations on the incident shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions are carried out in this study over an extensive flow range (Ma = 2.0-5.0, Reδ = 7.4 × 10-7.29 × 10). Utilizing the simulated flow field structures and literature data, this paper analyzes the essential influencing factors for determining the plateau pressure. Two nondimensional parameters—the incompressible shape factor of the incoming boundary layer and the nondimensional separation-bubble height—are identified as the essential influencing factors for the nondimensional pressure rise function at the plateau. A new scaling rule is proposed by taking these two nondimensional parameters into consideration, and the experimental data of the SWTBLIs after scaling collapse well onto a single curve with an R value of 0.918. The experimental data used to validate the scaling rule include incident and ramp SWTBLIs and the leading SWTBLIs in shock trains. The proposed scaling rule can be used to establish more accurate theoretical predicting models for SWTBLIs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109738464&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0050113; https://pubs.aip.org/pof/article/33/7/075104/1077034/Improvement-of-the-free-interaction-theory-for; https://repository.lsu.edu/mechanical_engineering_pubs/951; https://repository.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1951&context=mechanical_engineering_pubs
AIP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know