Green supplier selection and order allocation using AHP-SAW and goal programming
AIP Conference Proceedings, ISSN: 1551-7616, Vol: 2453
2022
- 11Citations
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In the supply chain, environmental aspects become a concern for stakeholders. One of the strategic decisions in the supply chain field is Green Supplier Selection and Order Allocation (GSSOA). This study proposes the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and simple additive weight (SAW) and Goal Programming procedures in addressing the GSSOA problem. The five criteria and 13 sub-criteria are utilized in applied to plastic manufacturing companies. Based on AHP, the results indicate that quality criteria present a higher level of importance than cost, delivery, service, and environment. Furthermore, the suitability of the material with specifications (QU1) serves as the sub-criteria with the highest weight. The result of the preference assessment with SAW further indicates that supplier 2 presents the highest preference. The application of goal programming is advantageous to determine the optimal order allocation. The results depict that suppliers 2 and 3 are eligible to supply 150 each to fulfill demand.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know