An experimental metaheuristic approach for portfolio optimization problem with cardinality constraint
AIP Conference Proceedings, ISSN: 1551-7616, Vol: 2576
2022
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
The addition of cardinality constraint to the standard mean-variance portfolio optimization problem makes it investor-friendly. However, by adding the cardinality constraint, the exact methods fail in solving the portfolio optimization problem. Cardinality Constrained Portfolio Optimization Problem (CCPOP) is solved using two metaheuristics approaches in this work for a collection of thirty-one assets. Further, the two metaheuristic techniques are analyzed using seven performance metrics in their effectiveness to solve the CCPOP. Also, the changes in the efficient frontier on varying the value of the cardinality constraint are analyzed. The results are presented in tabular form, and a conclusion is drawn on the comparison of the metaheuristic techniques in solving CCPOP.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know