PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The concordance between greenhouse gas emissions, livestock production and profitability of extensive beef farming systems

Animal Production Science, ISSN: 1836-5787, Vol: 56, Issue: 3, Page: 370-384
2016
  • 51
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 58
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    51
    • Citation Indexes
      51
  • Captures
    58

Conference Paper Description

Here we examine the concordance among emissions, production and gross margins of extensive beef farming systems by modelling a range of scenarios for herd management, animal genotype and pasture nutritive quality. We based our simulations on a case-study farm in central Queensland, Australia, and studied the influence of interventions designed for emissions mitigation, increasing productivity, or increasing gross margin. Interventions included replacing urea supplementation with nitrate, finishing cattle on the perennial forage leucaena (L), herd structure optimisation (HO), higher female fecundity (HF), and a leucaena finishing enterprise that had net farm emissions equal to the baseline (leucaena equal emissions; LEE). The HO intervention reduced the ratio of breeding cows relative to steers and unmated heifers, and lowered the ratio of costs to net cattle sales. Gross margin of the baseline, nitrate, L, LEE, HO and HF scenarios were AU$146000, AU$91000, AU$153000, AU$170000, AU$204000 and AU$216000, respectively. Enterprises with early joining of maiden heifers as well as HO and HF further increased gross margin (AU$323000), while systems incorporating all compatible interventions (HO, HF, early joining, LEE) had a gross margin of AU$315000. We showed that interventions that increase liveweight turnoff while maintaining net farm emissions resulted in higher gross margins than did interventions that maintained liveweight production and reduced net emissions. A key insight of this work was that the relationship between emissions intensity (emissions per unit liveweight production) or liveweight turnoff with gross margin were negative and positive, respectively, but only when combinations of (compatible) interventions were included in the dataset. For example, herd optimisation by reducing the number of breeding cows and increasing the number of sale animals increased gross margin by 40%, but this intervention had little effect on liveweight turnoff and emissions intensity. However, when herd optimisation was combined with other interventions that increased production, gross margins increased and emissions intensity declined. This is a fortuitous outcome, since it implies that imposing more interventions with the potential to profitably enhance liveweight turnoff allows a greater reduction in emissions intensity, but only when each intervention works synergistically with those already in place.

Bibliographic Details

Matthew T. Harrison; Brendan R. Cullen; Richard J. Eckard; Nigel W. Tomkins; Chris McSweeney; Philip Cohn

CSIRO Publishing

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know